Friday, October 25, 2013

Relief for Mind and Body



     Jane, a lifelong Catholic, and Bob, a convert, were married in 1958 at the ages of twenty-one and twenty-three.  Bob was attending college on the GI Bill, augmented by his father, while Jane worked to pay the rent.  Before the wedding, Jane told her priest she and Bob would be using rhythm.  That would be permissible, the priest told her, for up to two years.  Early in the marriage, Jane suffered a miscarriage.  After that, the couple was able to avoid pregnancy during the time it took Bob to finish college.  Their first child was born in 1960, and three more followed in roughly two year intervals.  The fifth child was born four years later, in 1970, after the couple thought they’d had their last.
     Jane did not want to have more children.  If anything happened to her in childbirth, who would take care of the five she already had—the Church?  She consulted the wife of a former priest friend about what the Church permitted.  The answer: her decision was whether or not to use artificial birth control; after that, the Church made no distinction and so the choice of what to use would be hers.  Jane talked the matter over with a Protestant neighbor, who said, “Look, Jane, when I die, God will say, ‘Dee, you were a good Protestant.  You used birth control.  You may go to Heaven.’ But when you die, God will say, ‘Jane, you used birth control. You were not a good Catholic.  You may not go to Heaven.’  Does that make sense?”
     Jane went on the Pill.  A few years later she thought she was pregnant and went to her doctor for the urine test.  During the days she awaited the results, she felt terrified.  Because she was nearing forty, she became convinced that the child would be deformed.  She saw herself smothering the newborn.  Around other people, she was able to hold herself together, but when she was alone, she cried uncontrollably.  Then the doctor called.  “Whatever made you think you were pregnant?” he asked.
     Seeing the distress Jane had been in, Bob volunteered to have a vasectomy.  Jane felt vastly relieved.  He consulted a doctor who explained that the procedure was a simple cut and stitch that could be done in-office in a matter of a few minutes.  Bob took a day off from work and felt some tenderness for a day or two, for which the doctor had recommended ice packs.  Back at work, he told a friend about the vasectomy.  By the end of that day, many colleagues were making joking references to it and several left ice packs on his desk. 

Friday, August 9, 2013

Blindsided



 When I mentioned the name of this blog to Ann, my friend since fourth grade at St. Mary’s School and like myself turning 70 this year, she laughed and said Catholic women’s birth control was an oxymoron.  Ann describes her childhood self as “a tomboy [who] loved to play cowboys and Indians, as well as army, mostly with [another neighbor hood girl] and all the boys, so much fun.  We were re-enactors for hours on end.  I liked the energy and drama and imagination."  

Although I recall her as interested in dating from seventh and eighth grade on into public high school, Ann says that despite a keen desire for attention from boys and men, she was not interested in sex and would not have sought it out.  Halfway through high school it was her new boyfriend, five years older than she and a charmer, who led her past the “making out” that had characterized her previous relationships with boys her own age.  They married the summer after our junior year, had their first child a few months later and three more babies in quick succession.  “I didn’t know how it happened,” she says of her rapid ascent to motherhood. As nature would have it,” she says, “Ovulation attracts a man.  I understand that now.  I had no voice, no choice, none.”  She wanted to be a good wife and mother and to obey the laws of the church.  Although early in the marriage she had intimations that her husband lacked what it took to be a family man, her feeling was that “I had made my bed and I must lie in it….It was a time of confusion and uncertainty….I didn’t think of the future.  I was so overwhelmed and busy I was in a fog.”


Birth control was something Ann discussed with no one, not her mother, her husband or a friend.  A few years later when another young mother in town went on the Pill, Ann was amazed at her audacity.

When her husband’s alcoholism, negligence and infidelities became too blatant for her to ignore and when she began to see his aggressive tendencies mirrored in her young sons, Ann sought a divorce.  Her pastor was horrified by the account Ann gave him of the ordeal her marriage had been and assured her she would qualify for an annulment.  She did not seek one, however, putting her energies instead into making a future for herself and her children.   To get a fresh start, she moved from our hometown to a small city two hours away.  She became a hairstylist, and in a shop in her home pursued earning a living with very little financial assistance from her former husband.  Over the years she was involved in several relationships, including a short, disastrous second marriage.   At one point she started using a diaphragm.  Attention from men—excitement, romance, and heart-to-heart talks more than sex--still filled a deep craving, but experience had convinced her that she hadn’t the resources, material or emotional, to bring another child into the world.  She still didn’t discuss birth control with friends or family members, not even her sister or her young daughter.

Ann had sent her children to parochial school and taken them to Church on Sundays, but they were growing up in a very different time from her own.  When it looked as though her teenage daughter was about to become sexually active, Ann finally broke a taboo and suggested she might pursue birth control.  “Oh, Mom,” her savvy daughter replied, “I’ve been on the Pill for a year.”  When the daughter married—at a young age—Ann’s mother gave her a booklet with a calendar set up for the rhythm method.  “Oh, Mimi,” C. laughed, “What am I supposed to do with this?  Put it between my knees?”

Ann was in her forties and reeling from her second divorce when an acquaintance suggested, “Maybe you’d like to talk to Nancy.”  Nancy, an alcohol awareness counselor, steered Ann into a reading/writing group on codependency.  “That group was my life saver,” Ann says now.  “It gave me permission to be me.”
Such permission is not what Ann grew up with.  In hindsight, she now sees herself in a line of women—her mother and her mother’s mother—raised to put the feelings of others ahead of their own and to give their husbands carte blanche.  Growing up as the oldest girl in a large family, she was her mother’s primary helper; in high school she took the home economics course.  Gifted and well trained in the domestic arts, she was prepared to make someone a good wife but not necessarily to develop her own self.  “To be selfless,” she says “was the mark of a good woman.”  She thinks, furthermore, that if her father had taken a more personal interest in her she might not have craved attention from other males.

While participating in the co-dependency group, Ann sought out her mother’s sisters and found that their stories bore resemblances to hers.  She came to see co-dependency as as crippling an affliction as alcoholism—indeed, the two seemed to go hand-in-hand—and as “part and parcel with the Catholic Church.”  With her new awareness and her children nearly grown, Ann found time to participate in a community theater group, to take adult education courses and to read widely in self-help literature.  Too busy to seek her self-esteem in a man, she stopped dating.  She was in her late fifties, attending a play alone, when she met the man who eventually became her third husband—a match, as the saying goes, made in heaven.

Although Ann continued to think of herself as Catholic long after her practices diverged from the Church’s teachings on birth control and sex outside of marriage, she no longer does.  The final break occurred when a friend in her co-dependency group discovered that the priest who had spent time at the friend’s house and went camping with the family had molested all five of her children.  For Ann, the priest’s heinous behavior underscored the lack of concern for individual women and children that she had come to associate with the Church.  “I was not taught to take charge of my life and I became a case of arrested development,” she says.  “Marriage was all about the other person.”  Until her third husband, the men she was involved with had shown no desire to gratify her sexually.  “My sexuality was stunted.  It was all about babies.”  To Ann’s way of thinking, it is a desire to populate the world with Catholics that explains the Church’s opposition to birth control—and what she sees as its indifference to a woman’s hardships or her sexual development.

Friday, May 31, 2013

A Tubal Ligation After Four Pregnancies in Four Years



Linda and Dave were married in 1988 when they were both 23.  Dave saw one or two children in their future, Linda two or three or more, but they agreed that before starting a family they needed to build a nest egg, and so Linda went on the Pill.  Originally from Albany, the couple settled in New York City where over the next few years they established themselves in their careers and did well enough financially to buy a brownstone in Brooklyn. 

On Mother’s Day, 1994, Linda had a miscarriage at twelve weeks.  The entire pregnancy had been shadowed with uncertainty—her doctor, in fact, had advised her not to tell a lot of people she was pregnant.  Although not a complete surprise, the miscarriage was a significant event.  Linda's body expelled the fetus and the doctor examined her to see that no fetal tissue remained.  It happened that the ob/gyn practice shared space with an infertility clinic, and the doctor pointed out that, unlike the patients in the other practice, Linda had no problem conceiving.  Linda found his words encouraging and felt her problems were minor compared to those of the fertility patients.

Her first child, a daughter, was born six weeks early in February of 1995.  The baby was healthy but small and so was placed in the neonatal unit.  Seeing the other babies in the unit was an eye-opener for Linda.  Once again, she felt fortunate in comparison.

Twenty three months later, a second daughter was born.  At this point, Linda surmised that Dave’s cup was full, and that, in fact, further children would place on the marriage more strain than it could bear.  When her second daughter was four months old--and still breastfeeding--Linda became pregnant once again.  With one daughter in a stroller and the other in her arms, she picked up a home pregnancy test at the pharmacy.  The young African American woman behind the counter gave her a big smile and shook her head.  Although the test came out positive, Linda delayed, hope against hope, going to her ob/gyn practice until she was four and one half months along.  When she lay down on the table, the doctor pulled up her blouse, looked at her stomach and said, “Oh, yeah!”  With her previous pregnancies, Linda had told the doctor she didn’t want to know the sex of the baby.   This doctor, however, was new to the practice and not knowing Linda’s preference, waved an ultrasound wand over her belly and announced it was a boy.  Linda and Dave were content with two girls and neither had yearned for a boy to complete the family.  Nevertheless, Linda felt it softened the blow when she phoned Dave directly after the doctor’s appointment to confirm the news both had feared.  

Linda’s new fear was for her marriage.  For the first time in her life, the option of abortion crossed her mind.  She wouldn’t have chosen that route, she says now.  Besides, by the time she saw the doctor, the pregnancy had advanced beyond the limit for a legal termination.

The unspoken agreement between Linda and Dave was that birth control was her responsibility.  Since putting chemicals into her body in the form of the Pill had become repugnant to her, she discussed the matter with her doctor and decided to have her tubes tied.  While she was still on the delivery table, however, and the doctor raised the topic again, Dave, who had long talked of having a vasectomy said, “No, I’m going to take care of things on my end.”  As the weeks went by, however, and he took no action, Linda took matters into her own hands.  She had to sign papers all over again and allow for a thirty day grace period before, finally, having her tubes tied, a decision for which she has no regrets.  The procedure itself, on the other hand, was harder on her than she’d expected.  An overnight stay in the hospital deemed unnecessary, she left the doctor’s office in considerable discomfort to return home to a toddler and two babies.  Dave did not take time off from work, but, fortunately, a woman friend accompanied her to her appointment and helped out at home afterwards.

As Linda feared, Dave never quite adjusted to being the father of three stair-step children.  It was his decision to move out of the house three years ago, and he and Linda are about to complete divorce proceedings.  Their marriage, long shaky, could not endure the tumult of three vibrant, unique young people moving into adolescence.  He continues to parent at a remove, while the tension level in the household has dropped dramatically.  Certain that their marriage lacked a sacramental quality, Linda plans to pursue an annulment.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

A Memory--Retrieved or Fabricated



Jonathan Gottshall in The Story-Telling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human warns, “Be skeptical of…your own blog posts...” The past does not exist, he says, but we make sense of our lives and give them purpose by drawing from various parts of the brain to construct sustaining fictions.

I remember that the mother of a childhood friend of mine kept a calendar in her kitchen on which she marked off certain days.  Years later it occurred to me that the calendar was a birth control guide.  When I mentioned this recently to my friend, she was astonished and remembered no such calendar.  My friend’s mother was a gifted and devoted mother, but, possibly, she would not have chosen to have six babies.  Rhythm, on the other hand, may be the reason she didn’t have ten.  In that time before Our Bodies Ourselves and the like, women didn’t talk so openly with each other about birth control.  My own mother, I tend to think, would keep a rhythm calendar—if she kept one at all—in a drawer in her bedroom and reveal it to no one.  I feel grateful and privileged that my friend’s mother collected personal data so openly—if indeed that’s what she was doing and the calendar really did exist and my memory isn’t playing tricks on me.

Today, thanks to such blogs as Koala Bear and Christian Mommy, a range of personal, on-going stories concerning birth control are readily available.  That doesn't excuse me, however, from doing more field work in unearthing stories from women of all ages.  So many are willing to share if only someone asks.


Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Wanting to Have a Lot of Kids

My daughter Jane, who lives in Montreal and works in social media, alerted me to Practicing Mammal which led me to The Koala Bear Writer.

The Practicing Mammal blogger lives in Vancouver and has nine children.

Coming Home: Practicing Mammal's Conversion Story

"My conversion happened in 1991. At the Easter Vigil, I entered the Catholic Church. I converted from Nothing. Of course conversion is an ongoing affair and today I am still converting. I am still learning and growing and turning my heart toward God on a daily basis. But how I got from Nothing to embracing the Catholic Church as my home is yet another angle on the mysterious ways that God works in our life. It wasn't sudden. In fact, I kind of oozed my way toward the Church, over about ten years..."

Click here to read the full post from Friday, February 22, 2013.

My thanks to the Koala Bear Writer for authorizing me to share this content.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Flying in the Face of Church Teaching

The story below comes from the blog MomsRising.   I've left in a fair amount of argumentation because it seems to be integral to the story/personal experience.

Having been a lay minister in the RCIA program and a catechism teacher for years I am very well informed about the Catholic Church’s teaching on birth control. I have read West, Everett and the Theology of the Body.

My husband and I did use NFP for a number of years until I acquired an ovarian tumor after our second child and had to have a radical hysterectomy/oophorectomy. Since then I have been able to analyze church teaching through both a pastoral lens and from the standpoint of no longer being personally emotionally involved in the teaching because I no longer have the equipment that the teaching applies to.

My first experience was that having relations with my husband became stress free after my hysterectomy. This was very freeing for me personally and for our marriage and it flew in the face of what I had been taught about non-procreative sex. My husband and I have been married for 18 years and our bond is stronger than ever since the hysterectomy. It made me wonder why I got to enjoy stress free marital relations when all of my friends of the same age were required by the Church to stress over intimate relations with their spouse. It began to seem very unfair to me. I would hear couples’ stories of struggle, depression, and in some cases the destruction of their marriages from this teaching. It was also an irony that I saw that the best marriages in my parish, the ones that are still standing strong, are the marriages in which artificial birth control was the couples’ decision without question from the very beginning. My experiences have not panned out to look like what West and Everett said they should.

What I have found is that despite the arguments of West, Everett, and TTB the Church has failed to address the very real fact that most Catholics’ consciences are actually very well informed about this teaching despite what the Holy Father would like to believe. I have worked with these couples and families and these people know why the teaching about birth control is what it is, and they do not see that it is transparent to reason, so they have rejected it.

It would be one thing to say that 10% of Catholics reject this teaching and therefore need to have their consciences corrected, but it is entirely something else to take basically the entire Church and say the entire Church needs to be educated. From my experience this is simply not the case.

That is not to say that the Church is a democracy, but rather that if the Church is so poor at persuading people to follow this teaching then something may be going on that the Holy Spirit may be involved in. The Church leadership refuses to pay attention to this and it is suffering the consequences. From my experience this is not because priests are not preaching the teaching, because I have always lived in a parish were it is taught every weekend and the more it is taught the more the parish rejects it. Telling people not to do things because the Church says so is not an effective argument and year after year it becomes less and less effective.

The argument that the laity are not informed is often the lazy argument that Church leaders like to propagate so that they don’t have to fully look at why their teaching is not being accepted and do the hard work behind this, such as humbly admit their error.